​Occasionally I come across those who claim – either explicitly or implicitly – that personal “revelation” is at least equal to or exceeds the authority of Scripture.

But does this hold up?

2 Tim 3:16-17 says that all Scripture comes from God Himself and is the standard for correction and reproof – even as against other revelation we think we have received – regarding doctrine, faith and life itself.

Jesus told a story which reinforces this point. In it, a poor servant named Lazarus died and went to Abraham’s bosom, while a rich man died and went to Hell.

The rich man pleads that Lazarus be sent to give a miraculous, personal revelation to his still living brothers to warn them of Hell so they will stop being wicked.

Abraham’s response is very telling: “If they do not hear Moses and the Prophets [i.e., the Old Testament], neither will they be convinced if someone should rise from the dead.” Luke 16:31.

Is it any different today?

Why do some insist on personal revelation where God has already clearly spoken in His written Word of Scripture?

Isn’t it arrogant to expect more from God after already discounting His plenary authority of Scripture?

In fact, aren’t they just like the rich man in Jesus’ parable?

God can do what He wants and speak how He wants …

But in this parable Jesus warns us not to normally expect “revelations” from Him where we have not been willing to submit to His existing, authoritative revelation of Scripture.

It sure seems to me that Jesus, in this story, also establishes the clear hierarchy of His written Word over all other revelation …

While certainly not discounting the fact that God can and does speak many ways.

But in all cases, God stands resolute against any “revelation” contrary to His external Word of Scripture.