Salvation isn’t about “asking Jesus into your heart”.
There’s nothing in the New Testament which says that.
Rather, it’s about repenting and submitting to His Kingdom …
On His terms, not ours.
In the final day …
That’s the only Gospel that counts.
There are no “worship leaders” in the New Testament.
Nope, not, nada.
In fact, the very concept is utterly missing from “church” as actually taught in Scripture.
Could your notions of “church”, therefore, be more about your post-Biblical presumptions …
Than actually submitting to God’s Word instead?
Reject God’s authority of Scripture as revealed, transcendent and propositional truth …
And ekklesia is impossible.
It’s like cats trying to herd themselves.
Someone asked if I believe in women clergy.
No way, no how!
But then again, I don’t believe in men clergy either. 😉
Seriously, there is no clergy/laity divide in the New Testament.
Instead, we are ALL commanded to submit one to another as we minister to each other …
No matter the level of grace, differing function or diverse gifts we’ve been given.
The true Gospel doesn’t appeal to our vanities through the compromising enticements of men …
But convicts us of our sin through the uncompromised power of the Holy Spirit.
Hubris knows no bounds,
Which is why those who dismiss originalism in Scripture …
Inevitably dismiss originalism in our Constitution.
The key to success in business, as in life, is learning to legitimately meet people’s needs …
Rather than using them to meet yours.
Three things not found in the New Testament:
– Current prevailing concepts of “pastor”;
– Current prevailing concepts of “worship”; and
– Current prevailing concepts of “church”.
My God bring forth those with the courage to pursue the authentic as He defines it …
Rather than remain stuck in post-biblical human traditions.
State-ratified vice …
Is State-ratified bondage.
It’s one thing to allow private sin …
But another entirely for the State to publicly endorse it.
God and “me” are not the church …
But God and “we” just might be.
There is no Christ …
In a “Jesus” on your terms.
Cynicism isn’t a retreat from evil …
But from good.
What is existentialism, and why does it matter?
Existentialist is a worldly philosophy which believes that each individual can define – on their own terms – what is true, right and real based on their own perceptions and personal sensibilities.
Many “Christians” do this, whether consciously or not.
They often claim to have a “high view” of Scripture, but then discount anything in it which contradicts their own perceptions and sensibilities.
Whether they call themselves “Emergent”, “Progressive”, “Red Letter Christians”, “Beyond Evangelical”, “Neo-orthodox” or whatever …
They set themselves over God’s plenary authority of Scripture by defining truth, reality and morality on their own terms when it suits their own purposes.
Inevitably, this leads them to project their own perceptions and sensibilities onto Jesus Himself …
To then create their own “Christ” after their own likeness and image.
In essence, they end up worshipping themselves by deceiving themselves through their false Christ …
Who is nothing more than a projection of themselves.
Like any idol, this “Jesus” of their own creation then justifies their religion of self …
Both to themselves (whether knowingly or not) and to those they seek to deceive (again, whether knowingly or not).
Unfortunately, our “churches” today are filled with such people …
Because many “churches” find it’s easier to cater to such narcissism than call for true repentance.
Existential deception is a defining issue of our times because the real Jesus didn’t choose to leave everything up to our personal foibles and follies …
But chose to authoritatively define Himself – and what is ultimately true, real and right – through Scripture as His written Word.
Anything less is a lie.
It brings no dishonor to God …
To honor what is honorable in a nation and its founding principles.
“Assembly” is probably the closest English word to “ekklesia”, which is commonly mistranslated as “church” in our English Bibles.
But even “assembly” falls short.
In the common usage of the day when the New Testament was written, “ekklesia” almost always referred to the participatory governing authority in a city …
Made up of local citizens appointed by a larger empire.
In Israel during Jesus’ time on Earth, the local ekklesia under Roman rule was the Sanhedrin.
Each city or provence had their own local ekklesia, appointed by the conquering Roman empire to assemble and manage the affairs of the city through local citizens selected by the emperor.
It was democratic as to internal function, but not ultimate authority.
The idea of Christ building His ekklesia, therefore, was both subversive to Roman ears, but fully in line with His further teachings on His Kingdom.
Unfortunately, “church” today has little to do – either as to form or function – with what “ekklesia” actually meant when the New Testament was written.
To really understand the Bible, we need to learn what it actually said when written, based on the meaning and context of the words used …
Rather than reading back into those words our contrary post-New Testament meanings.
We can not deserve, earn or choose God’s grace …
Otherwise, it’s not grace.
But we certainly can reject it.
The Bible doesn’t say to believe in yourself …
But to die to self.
Jesus never said to forgive yourself …
But to forgive others and then ask God to forgive you.
The Gospel isn’t about affirming you …
But about repenting and surrendering to Christ’s rule.
Only then will you find yourself, your freedom and your validation …
As defined by Him.
Says who?
God or you?
Outside God’s plenary authority of Scripture as His written word …
There no definitive way to say.
Faith is trust …
And thus the antithesis of doubt.
Reformed Theology says it’s impossible to reject God’s grace when offered …
Based on the philosophic concept that doing so would involve human autonomy against God’s sovereignty.
The flaw is that Reformed Theology does not see that there is a third option, which runs throughout Scripture.
The choice isn’t Calvinism = a Sovereign God …
While Arminianism = Human autonomy.
Rather, Biblical doctrine shows a God who is so sovereign …
He can offer grace to those who have no choice in and of themselves, while also granting them the choice to reject that grace.
Denying God’s sovereign right to delegate that choice is, at it’s core, a denial of His sovereignty.
We are bound by the limits of our fallen nature, which makes us “dead in our trespasses and sin”.
We are not sick, but dead.
Free will, therefore, is a myth apart from God’s grace giving us the option to choose life.
A dead man has no choice otherwise.
There is no human autonomy to choose anything apart from what God has chosen to delegate and enable.
He allowed Adam to choose sin. He now, through the Cross, enables us to choose life.
That’s what makes grace so amazing.
The irony of hard core “Calvinism” is that it diminishes God’s sovereignty …
By claiming He can’t delegate to others the option to reject Him.
Can a God who is so limited truly be considered to have absolute sovereignty?
This is the inherent contradiction in their systematic reformed theology.
They have great insight on many things, but can not reconcile their philosophic concept of God’s “sovereignty” …
With His right to delegate, as He chooses, the option to reject His sovereignty.
They are thus trapped in a fundamental internal contradiction …
Of defining God as so sovereign, He can’t actually be sovereign.
There are four verses in the New Testament which admonish Christians to sing together when we gather …
And the ONLY reason given is to encourage one another.
The idea of worship in the church as a way to experience, encounter or invoke God’s presence is not found in the New Testament.
Rather, it is from the Old Testament idea of the temple, where you went to encounter God.
In contrast, under the New Covenant, we have become God’s temple because He now dwells in us.
Thus, we sing to express God’s presence already in us, not to bring His presence to us.
And we are to do it congregationally for the purpose of encouraging one another …
Not as a staged performance to manipulate intense reactions which we then call “God”.
Most of what we call “worship” today …
Is so contrived and manipulative as to be an affront to God.
Most are so unwilling to submit their concept of “worship” to what the New Testament actually says is worship …
That they don’t even care.
Because He loves us, God offers grace without merit …
But also requires repentance in return.
Anything less on either point …
Emasculates the Gospel.
